Mega Default In China Scheduled For January 31
 
   On
 Friday, Chinese state media reported that China Credit Trust Co. warned
 investors that they may not be repaid when one of its wealth management
 products matures on January 31, the first day of the Year of the Horse.
 
The Industrial and Commercial Bank of China sold the China Credit Trust 
product to its customers in inland Shanxi province. This bank, the 
world’s largest by assets, on Thursday suggested it will not compensate 
investors, stating in a phone interview with Reuters that “a situation 
completely does not exist in which ICBC will assume the main 
responsibility.”
 
There should be no mystery why this investment, known as “2010 China 
Credit-Credit Equals Gold #1 Collective Trust Product,” is on the verge 
of default. China Credit Trust loaned the proceeds from sales of the 
3.03 billion-yuan ($496.2 million) product to unlisted Shanxi Zhenfu 
Energy Group, a coal miner. The coal company probably is paying 
something like 12% for the money because Credit Equals Gold promised a 
10% annual return to investors—more than three times current bank 
deposit rates—and China Credit Trust undoubtedly took a hefty cut of the
 interest. 
 
Zhenfu was undoubtedly desperate for money. One of its vice chairmen was
 arrested in May 2012 for taking deposits without a banking license, 
undoubtedly trying to raise funds through unconventional channels. In 
any event, the company was permitted to borrow long after it should have
 been stopped—reports indicate that it had accumulated 5.9 billion yuan 
in obligations. Zhenfu, according to one Chinese newspaper account, has 
already been declared bankrupt with assets of less than 500 million 
yuan.
 
The Credit Equals Gold product is not the first troubled WMP, as these 
investments are known, to risk nonpayment, but Chinese officials have 
always managed to make investors whole. CITIC Trust did that in 2013 on a
 steel-loan product in Hubei province, and a mysterious third-party 
guarantee rescued a Hua Xia Bank WMP. An investment marketed by ICBC’s 
Suzhou branch was similarly repaid.
 
There has never been a default—other than one of timing—of a WMP, so the
 Credit Equals Gold product could be the first. If it is, it will edge 
out the WMP that invested in loans to Liansheng Resources Group, another
 Shanxi coal miner. Jilin Trust packaged Liansheng’s loans into a wealth
 management product sold by China Construction Bank , the country’s 
second-largest lender by assets, to its customers. Liansheng is in 
bankruptcy, and it looks like the WMP holders will not be repaid in 
full.
 
A WMP default, whether relating to Liansheng or Zhenfu, could devastate 
the Chinese banking system and the larger economy as well. In short, 
China’s growth since the end of 2008 has been dependent on ultra-loose 
credit first channeled through state banks, like ICBC and Construction 
Bank, and then through the WMPs, which permitted the state banks to 
avoid credit risk. Any disruption in the flow of cash from investors to 
dodgy borrowers through WMPs would rock China with sky-high interest 
rates or a precipitous plunge in credit, probably both. The result? The 
best outcome would be decades of misery, what we saw in Japan after its 
bubble burst in the early 1990s.
 
Most analysts don’t worry about a WMP default. Their argument is that 
the People’s Bank of China, the central bank, is encouraging a failure 
of the Zhenfu product to teach investors to appreciate risk and such 
lesson will improve the allocation of credit nationwide. Furthermore, 
they reason the central authorities would never allow a default to 
threaten the system. 
 
Observers make the logical argument that “to have a market meltdown, you
 have to have a market” and China does not have one. Instead, Beijing 
technocrats dictate outcomes.
 
That’s correct, but that is also why China is now heading to catastrophic failure.
 Because Chinese leaders have the power to prevent corrections, they do 
so. Because they do so, the underlying imbalances become larger. Because
 the underlying imbalances become larger, the inevitable corrections are
 severe. Downturns, which Beijing hates, are essential, allowing 
adjustments to be made while they are still relatively minor. The last 
year-on-year contraction in China’s gross domestic product, according to
 the official National Bureau of Statistics, occurred in 1976, the year 
Mao Zedong died.
 
Why will China’s next correction be historic in its severity? Because 
Chinese leaders will prevent adjustments until they no longer have the 
ability to do so. When they no longer have that ability, their system 
will simply fail. Then, there will be nothing they can do to prevent the
 freefall. 
 
We are almost at that critical point, as events last June and December 
demonstrate. The PBOC did not try to tighten credit as analysts said in 
June and December; it simply did not add liquidity. The failure to add 
liquidity caused interbank rates to soar and banks to default on their 
interbank obligations. In the face of the resulting crises, the central 
bank backed down both times, injecting more money into state banks and 
the economy. So Chinese leaders showed us twice last year that they now 
have no ability—or no will—to deal with the most important issue they 
face, the out-of-control creation of debt. 
 
There are rumors that local authorities in Shanxi will either find cash 
so that Liansheng can pay back its loans or force institutions to roll 
over the WMP marketed by Jilin Trust. Similarly, there are suggestions 
that ICBC, despite its we’re-not-responsible statement, will produce 
dough for the Credit Equals Gold investors. Others say China Credit 
Trust, China’s third-largest such group as measured by assets, will 
repay investors in part. Repayment will avoid an historic default and 
postpone a reckoning. In all probability, authorities will be able to 
get past Zhenfu if they try to do so.
 
Even if Beijing makes sure there is no default on January 31, we should 
not feel relief. Just as Zhenfu followed Liansheng, there will be 
another WMP borrower on the edge of disaster after Zhenfu. And there are
 many Lianshengs and Zhenfus out there. There may have been 11 trillion 
yuan in WMPs at the end of last year.
 
And at the same time China’s money supply and credit are still 
expanding. Last year, the closely watched M2 increased by only 13.6%, 
down from 2012’s 13.8% growth. Optimists say China is getting its credit
 addiction under control, but that’s not correct. In fact, credit 
expanded by at least 20% last year as money poured into new channels not
 measured by traditional statistics. That appears to be in excess of 
credit expansion in 2012. 
 
Even if credit expansion slowed last year, Silvercrest Asset 
Management’s Patrick Chovanec tells us why we should be concerned. As he
 wrote today, “Looking purely at the decline in the year-on-year rate of
 credit expansion is kind of like arguing that if I chase my shot of 
vodka with a pint of beer, I’m actually exercising moderation because 
the alcohol proof level of my drinks is falling.”
No comments:
Post a Comment