Mega Default In China Scheduled For January 31
On
Friday, Chinese state media reported that China Credit Trust Co. warned
investors that they may not be repaid when one of its wealth management
products matures on January 31, the first day of the Year of the Horse.
The Industrial and Commercial Bank of China sold the China Credit Trust
product to its customers in inland Shanxi province. This bank, the
world’s largest by assets, on Thursday suggested it will not compensate
investors, stating in a phone interview with Reuters that “a situation
completely does not exist in which ICBC will assume the main
responsibility.”
There should be no mystery why this investment, known as “2010 China
Credit-Credit Equals Gold #1 Collective Trust Product,” is on the verge
of default. China Credit Trust loaned the proceeds from sales of the
3.03 billion-yuan ($496.2 million) product to unlisted Shanxi Zhenfu
Energy Group, a coal miner. The coal company probably is paying
something like 12% for the money because Credit Equals Gold promised a
10% annual return to investors—more than three times current bank
deposit rates—and China Credit Trust undoubtedly took a hefty cut of the
interest.
Zhenfu was undoubtedly desperate for money. One of its vice chairmen was
arrested in May 2012 for taking deposits without a banking license,
undoubtedly trying to raise funds through unconventional channels. In
any event, the company was permitted to borrow long after it should have
been stopped—reports indicate that it had accumulated 5.9 billion yuan
in obligations. Zhenfu, according to one Chinese newspaper account, has
already been declared bankrupt with assets of less than 500 million
yuan.
The Credit Equals Gold product is not the first troubled WMP, as these
investments are known, to risk nonpayment, but Chinese officials have
always managed to make investors whole. CITIC Trust did that in 2013 on a
steel-loan product in Hubei province, and a mysterious third-party
guarantee rescued a Hua Xia Bank WMP. An investment marketed by ICBC’s
Suzhou branch was similarly repaid.
There has never been a default—other than one of timing—of a WMP, so the
Credit Equals Gold product could be the first. If it is, it will edge
out the WMP that invested in loans to Liansheng Resources Group, another
Shanxi coal miner. Jilin Trust packaged Liansheng’s loans into a wealth
management product sold by China Construction Bank , the country’s
second-largest lender by assets, to its customers. Liansheng is in
bankruptcy, and it looks like the WMP holders will not be repaid in
full.
A WMP default, whether relating to Liansheng or Zhenfu, could devastate
the Chinese banking system and the larger economy as well. In short,
China’s growth since the end of 2008 has been dependent on ultra-loose
credit first channeled through state banks, like ICBC and Construction
Bank, and then through the WMPs, which permitted the state banks to
avoid credit risk. Any disruption in the flow of cash from investors to
dodgy borrowers through WMPs would rock China with sky-high interest
rates or a precipitous plunge in credit, probably both. The result? The
best outcome would be decades of misery, what we saw in Japan after its
bubble burst in the early 1990s.
Most analysts don’t worry about a WMP default. Their argument is that
the People’s Bank of China, the central bank, is encouraging a failure
of the Zhenfu product to teach investors to appreciate risk and such
lesson will improve the allocation of credit nationwide. Furthermore,
they reason the central authorities would never allow a default to
threaten the system.
Observers make the logical argument that “to have a market meltdown, you
have to have a market” and China does not have one. Instead, Beijing
technocrats dictate outcomes.
That’s correct, but that is also why China is now heading to catastrophic failure.
Because Chinese leaders have the power to prevent corrections, they do
so. Because they do so, the underlying imbalances become larger. Because
the underlying imbalances become larger, the inevitable corrections are
severe. Downturns, which Beijing hates, are essential, allowing
adjustments to be made while they are still relatively minor. The last
year-on-year contraction in China’s gross domestic product, according to
the official National Bureau of Statistics, occurred in 1976, the year
Mao Zedong died.
Why will China’s next correction be historic in its severity? Because
Chinese leaders will prevent adjustments until they no longer have the
ability to do so. When they no longer have that ability, their system
will simply fail. Then, there will be nothing they can do to prevent the
freefall.
We are almost at that critical point, as events last June and December
demonstrate. The PBOC did not try to tighten credit as analysts said in
June and December; it simply did not add liquidity. The failure to add
liquidity caused interbank rates to soar and banks to default on their
interbank obligations. In the face of the resulting crises, the central
bank backed down both times, injecting more money into state banks and
the economy. So Chinese leaders showed us twice last year that they now
have no ability—or no will—to deal with the most important issue they
face, the out-of-control creation of debt.
There are rumors that local authorities in Shanxi will either find cash
so that Liansheng can pay back its loans or force institutions to roll
over the WMP marketed by Jilin Trust. Similarly, there are suggestions
that ICBC, despite its we’re-not-responsible statement, will produce
dough for the Credit Equals Gold investors. Others say China Credit
Trust, China’s third-largest such group as measured by assets, will
repay investors in part. Repayment will avoid an historic default and
postpone a reckoning. In all probability, authorities will be able to
get past Zhenfu if they try to do so.
Even if Beijing makes sure there is no default on January 31, we should
not feel relief. Just as Zhenfu followed Liansheng, there will be
another WMP borrower on the edge of disaster after Zhenfu. And there are
many Lianshengs and Zhenfus out there. There may have been 11 trillion
yuan in WMPs at the end of last year.
And at the same time China’s money supply and credit are still
expanding. Last year, the closely watched M2 increased by only 13.6%,
down from 2012’s 13.8% growth. Optimists say China is getting its credit
addiction under control, but that’s not correct. In fact, credit
expanded by at least 20% last year as money poured into new channels not
measured by traditional statistics. That appears to be in excess of
credit expansion in 2012.
Even if credit expansion slowed last year, Silvercrest Asset
Management’s Patrick Chovanec tells us why we should be concerned. As he
wrote today, “Looking purely at the decline in the year-on-year rate of
credit expansion is kind of like arguing that if I chase my shot of
vodka with a pint of beer, I’m actually exercising moderation because
the alcohol proof level of my drinks is falling.”
No comments:
Post a Comment