Societal Misandry in the Anti Male World
Recently, I had my eyes open to what is such an integral part of our
culture that it is hardly even noticed – Societal Misandry. Societal
Misandry created an Anti Male World that’s been bashed into our minds so
tightly, strong anti male bias and preferential treatment of females
are not only considered normal and therefore don’t raise any concerns
when they occur, any attempt to level the fields is met with strong
opposition from both the oppressors and the oppressed. In other words,
the indoctrination is so thorough, that even though it’s a privilege
(legally and socially) to be a woman, while it downright sucks (legally
and socially) to be a man, both men and women would automatically assume
it was the other way around, and would in all likelihood assume
offensive stances against anyone suggesting otherwise.
A good way to see what I’m talking about it by looking at the way we’re
expected to perceive violence against women, versus the society’s
expected perception of violence against men. When we see on television
images of a man receiving a hard kick in the crotch, everyone is
expected to find them funny and everyone, both men and women are
expected to laugh. Kicking a man in the crotch has become a staple of
comedy. But when we’re shown images of a woman receiving a hard kick in
the crotch, everyone is expected to express outrage and everyone, both
men and women are expected to call it an assault. Best Gore, of all
places, is a good example of how far reaching this Societal Misandry is,
as any depiction of violence against women is instantly met with calls
for the alleged perpetrator to be lynched, castrated and slowly
tortured.
I’m ashamed to admit it, but I was tainted by the societally anticipated
anti male discrimination just as badly as everyone else and like
everyone else, I failed to see it when it presented itself in all its
glory. When Mark was arrested, a female prosecutor made no attempts to
hide that she hated men down to the last stinky atom of her body, and
that she drew personal gratification from being able to put men down and
ruin their lives just because they were men. Yet because constantly
putting men down and ruining their lives just because they are men has
been such a staple of western societies, it didn’t occur to me in the
slightest that it was wrong.
Today, after decades of being berated and put down, men got so cowed,
they can’t even fight back anymore. They have no other option but to
laugh with everyone else at the images of men being kicked in the crotch
and assume themselves that every male, including themselves is an
unfeeling future rapist that’s best castrated and lynched at first
opportunity. Does it really surprise anyone that suicide rates of males
are 4 or more times as high as those of females, when boys are forced to
grow up feeling alienated?
How are boys not supposed to feel alienated, apologetic for their
existence, and eventually suicidal when even school books are feminized
and anti male, placing a lot of focus on the assumption that wars are
the result of the innately violent nature of men, while placing
virtually no focus on making boys proud for what men have achieved, such
as the discovery of mathematics, the printing press, electricity, the
steam engine and other important inventions that transformed the world
into the modern, physical labor saving, technologically advanced place
we inhabit today? Even the legal system that protects women’s safety and
women’s rights was invented by men.
This societal misandry is even propagated by the media, especially the
television. If you paid attention, you’d notice that sitcoms are replete
with images of oafish, bumbling males who in their awkwardness can only
ever move forward with the assistance of smart, smug females. You’d
also notice how crime shows depict men as evil murderers and rapists,
how feminized male stars relentlessly pursue them and when they get
them, they slam these evil rapists against a wall and bark: “you low
life scumbag!” But when the occasional episode revolves around a female
suspect, she’s never slammed against a wall and called a low life
scumbag cause in her case, there surely must have been a good reason for
murdering the child.
It is the same with TV commercials. Typically. as the scene opens, some
buffoon of a man is struggling to have a clue as to what something is
all about. Before long, an all-knowing woman, rolling her eyes and
shaking her head in pity, saves the day by helping the stupid buffoon of
a man not utterly ruin everything with the use of the product
advertised. Sometimes, not to be too repetitive, a version of a TV
commercial in which it is the children who are all-wise that help the
buffoon of a man figure things out as they step in with the product. And
of course, all of us, both men and women are expected to laugh:
“Hahaha, look at that stupid guy. What an idiot!”
I made this post to once and for all counter the disillusion that women
are disadvantaged in life because of male privilege and patriarchal
oppression. I was once the victim of this disillusion myself, so I know
all too well how saturated it is, and suspect many Best Gore readers
were tricked by societal misandry to embrace the anti male world too.
Note that instead of making this article a collection of my own
thoughts, I built it almost exclusively on references from what should
be for the most part considered “reliable sources”. All claims that
follow are based on scientific studies and researches by university
professors and are therefore verifiable facts, not opinions.
Bodily Integrity
In many countries, including Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, New
Zealand, Norway, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom and United States, a
woman has legal protection of her bodily integrity (her body, her
choice)[73], but a man does not (his body, not his choice).[72]
What that means is that Female Genital Mutilation is illegal, while Male
Genital Mutilation is not only legal, it’s often not even regulated so
it can be performed by anyone (pedophile Rabbi is not a schooled and
trained surgeon). Frequently, genital mutilation of men is performed
before the victim is old enough to make consenting choices of his
own.[71]
In some countries, such as the Philippines, boys are under societal
pressure to undergo genital mutilation, and in Indonesia, the act of
genital mutilation of boys is exaggerated by public humiliation.
In the Netherlands, girls have the right to bodily integrity and
mutilating their genitals is illegal. Boys do not have this right and
mutilating their genitals is not only legal, but covered by certain
health insurances.[36]
Rape
You Have Been Indoctrinated by Societal Misandry If You Instantly
Thought of Mocking a Man Who Dare Open Up About Having Been a Victim of
Rape
You Have Been Indoctrinated by Societal Misandry If You Instantly
Thought of Mocking a Man Who Dare Open Up About Having Been a Victim of
Rape
In many countries, the definition of rape does not include men being
raped by women.[1] In the UK, if a man uses his penis to penetrate a
woman without her consent, it is rape – a crime punishable by up to a
life in prison. However if a woman uses a man’s penis to penetrate
herself without his consent, it’s not rape, it’s merely “causing a
person to engage in sexual activity without consent” – a crime
punishable by up to 10 years in prison. In other words, a woman can’t
legally “rape” a man. In the anti-male world, for women there are
“lesser” crimes.[2]
On Wikipedia, under Laws Regarding Rape, I found this:[3]
There are no national standards for defining and reporting male-on-male,
female-on-female or female-on-male offenses, so such crimes are
generally not included in rape statistics unless these statistics are
compiled using information from states which count them as rape.
In Ireland, teenage boys can be prosecuted for underage sex while teen girls are exempt.[41]
In Israel, women cannot be charged with rape, only men can.[42] It is the same in India.[43]
Anti Male Bias in Dictionaries
Previous Definition of Word Rapist by Oxford Dictionaries
Previous Definition of Word Rapist by Oxford Dictionaries
When Mark was first charged, Oxford Dictionary’s definition of “Rapist”
was “a man who commits rape“. After countless complaints, the definition
was amended into “a person, typically a man, who commits rape“. The
anti men sexism and anti men gender based discrimination is embedded so
strongly in our societies, not even dictionaries try to hide it.
Oxford Dictionaries Amended the Definition of Rapist to This Joke
Oxford Dictionaries Amended the Definition of Rapist to This Joke
By the same logic, the definition of “Terrorist” should be “a person,
typically a Jew, who commits acts of terrorism“. Except that that’s not a
good example because women are perpetrators of rape equally often as
men, but terrorism has been dominated by the Jews since they invented
it. And I’m not merely talking about the invention of modern terrorism
which started with Jews bombing King David Hotel, the site for the
British Military Command in Palestine back in 1946, killing dozens of
innocent people and blaming it on Muslims, which is when word
“terrorism” was first used. I’m also talking about the earliest known
use of acts which would be known as terrorism today – Sicarii (which
translates as dagger-men) as they were known by the Romans were the
Zealots of Judea who carried on underground campaigns of assassination
of Roman forces, as well as anyone else they felt had collaborated with
the Romans.
I Took the Liberty of Fixing the Oxford Dictionaries Definition of
Terrorist Following the Same Guidelines They Use to Define Rapist
I Took the Liberty of Fixing the Oxford Dictionaries Definition of
Terrorist Following the Same Guidelines They Use to Define Rapist
Rape Policies on College Campuses
On April 4, 2011 (it became known as the April 4th Dear Colleague
Letter), the US federal Department of Education’s Office for Civil
Rights (OCR) sent a letter to colleges and universities throughout the
United States that receive federal funding, mandating policy changes in
the way schools address matters of sexual harassment and sexual assault
on campus.[4]
The letter reduces the standard of proof required to convict a male
student of rape to “preponderance of evidence” and “strongly
discourages” colleges from giving male students the right to question
their rape accuser. The directive also requires all universities to
allow alleged rape victims to appeal the results of college disciplinary
hearings, subjecting the accused to “double jeopardy” which is illegal
in US courts.[5]
Fake Rape Statistics
Men Don't Rape People, Rapists Rape People
Men Don’t Rape People, Rapists Rape People
The 1994 study by Eugene J. Kanin, Ph.D., published in the Archives Of
Sexual Behavior, Volume 23, No 1, conducted in a small metropolitan
community in the US found that 41% of rape accusations filed by women
were false. A follow up study, found 50% of rape allegations in college
to be false. 53% of the women admitted they filed the false claim as an
alibi.[6][7]
The findings, which were published by the forensic experts (unbiased
researchers who are neither pro feminist, nor anything else) concluded
with:
the research on accusations of rape, sexual harassment, incest, and
child sexual abuse indicates that false accusations have become a
serious problem. The motivations involved in making a false report are
widely varied and include confusion, outside influence from therapists
and others, habitual lying, advantages in custody disputes, financial
gain, and the political ideology of radical feminism.
What Fake Rape Victim Says vs What Probably Really Happened
What Fake Rape Victim Says vs What Probably Really Happened
According to a US Air force study, 60% of rapes allegations are false. A
full 27% of the allegations were confirmed to be false by the woman
admitting to making them up.[8] It however also must be said that the
military is pushing rape cases harder to appear like they are being
“fair” to women.
A rape prosecutor from Colorado by the name of Craig Silverman said:[9]
During my time as a prosecutor who made case filing decisions, I was
amazed to see all the false rape allegations that were made to the
Denver Police Department. It was remarkable and surprising to me. You
would have to see it to believe it. Any honest veteran sex assault
investigator will tell you that rape is one of the most falsely reported
crimes that there is. A command officer in the Denver police sex
assaults unit recently told me he placed the false rape numbers at
approximately 45 percent.
Regret Sex Doesn't Always Equal Rape Sex
Regret Sex Doesn’t Always Equal Rape Sex
The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey conducted by
the US National Center for Injury Prevention and Control of the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention found that women make up 40% of all
rapists and men are 50% of all victims outside of prison.[13]
As the case of Duke Lacrosse Players from Durham, North Carolina
suggests, men who are falsely accused of rape can have their names
smeared and their lives ruined, while their accuser is protected and is
likely to face no punishment, or at most a light one.[47]
However these figures do not take into account social stigmas that force
men into suppressing their victimization for fear of being viewed as
effeminate, weak or incompetent, and cultural tolerance and
glorification of women who falsely accuse men of rape.[58]
In India, a senior woman lawyer confirmed that females making false allegations of rape is at epidemic levels.[66]
This one is just… Serial false rape claimant who was eventually jailed after destroying 11 lives.[68]
Violence Against Victims of False Rape Accusations
This Is Gender Equality
This Is Gender Equality
I already said in the introduction to this article that even the readers
of BestGore, both men and women are guilty of strong anti male bias. It
reflects in the way they react to any news of alleged violence against
women, but you hardly ever see anything comparable when men are
subjected to unspeakable atrocities, which happens far more frequently
and with far greater ferocity.
Good example if the story of a man who was falsely accused of rape and
was lynched to death for it. He was later found to be innocent. Here’s
another alleged rapist was beheaded, stabbed and mutilated.
A few example not on Best Gore:
Teenage boy named Cory Headen from Courtenay, British Columbia, Canada
was beaten to death with a baseball bat after two girls falsely accused
him of rape.[10]
Woman falsely accused a man of raping her in order to sue for a $1.5
million settlement. Brian Banks spent 5 years in prison. The woman then
casually confessed that the accusation was fake and said she wanted
“bygones to be bygones” but did not want to have to pay back the money.
Where are calls to have this bitch castrated and tortured slowly?[11]
Town of Davis, California goes ape shit after a woman cries rape,
claiming that she was raped by teenage skater boys. Cops go overboard
questioning dozens of boys, feminists and their ilk hold rallies for the
“victim”. Male hating graffiti is spread across town, including such
perks as “Dead Boys Don’t Rape” and “Curfew for All Men”. The “victim”
admits the allegation was fake, the woman is not charged but feminists
and their ilk don’t accept the possibility it could be fake.[12]
Sentencing Disparity
Research by David B. Mustard, University of Georgia concluded that women
receive lighter sentences and a higher chance of acquittal, simply for
being women. Average sentence for same crime under similar circumstances
(armed robbery):[14]
Male: 51.52 months
Female: 18.51 months
Woman Lies About Father Raping Her, He Spends 9 Years in Jail,
Prosecutor Refuses to Charge Women for Fear It Would Discourage Other
Fake Rape Victims
Woman Lies About Father Raping Her, He Spends 9 Years in Jail,
Prosecutor Refuses to Charge Women for Fear It Would Discourage Other
Fake Rape Victims
A Queens Family Court Judge John Hunt analyzed the cases of eight
teenagers who had come before him – four boys and four girls – and found
that probation routinely recommended tougher treatment for boys, doing
all they could to spare all but the most violent girls from prison
time.[15]
In Canada, if a man kills a child, it’s considered murder, punishable by
up to a life in prison with no parole for 10 to 25 years. But if a
woman kills her children, she has the rights to be charged with
Infanticide, which carries a maximum sentence of 5 years and no minimum
sentence. Men do not have that right.[44]
Law Professor Sonja Starr from Michigan University found in her 2012
study of federal criminal cases that men receive on average 63% longer
sentences than women do, and women are twice as likely to avoid
incarceration if convicted all together.[45]
The following is based on 1990 – 2000 US census:[46]
For every 100 girls ages 15 to 17 in correctional facilities there are 837 boys behind bars.
For every 100 women ages 18 to 21 in correctional facilities there are 1430 men behind bars.
For every 100 women ages 22 to 24 in correctional facilities there are 1448 men in correctional facilities.
Sentencing Disparity in Anti Male World
Sentencing Disparity in Anti Male World
In a recent case from Canada, a 26 year old woman who gave oral sex to a
5 year old girl was found to NOT be a pedophile. Imagine if it was a
man giving oral sex to a 5 year old! Talk about sentencing
disparity.[67]
Another recent case of serious double standard from Houston, Texas –
woman teacher, pedophile and sexual predator seduces a 16 year old boy
and sexually violates him. She’s sentenced to no jail time, only a
$5,000 fine and a probation. No word on whether she will also end up
registered as a sex offender, which likely means that she probably won’t
as it would have been mentioned in the article. Imagine if roles were
reversed, if a male teacher seduced and sexually violated a 16 year
girl. We wouldn’t hear the end of it from the ranks of feminazis, and
the guy would be sentenced to 20+ years in prison and spend the rest of
his life knocking on people’s doors to tell them that he was a pedo and a
sexual deviant. Not to mention the little fact that prosecutors agreed
to the plea deal because Nikki Scherwitz agreed to send apologies to the
mother and the district, but not to the victim![69]
Domestic Violence
End Violence Against Everyone
End Violence Against Everyone
Basic domestic violence resolution policy in just about every western
country is “arrest the male“. Yet women are known to be more or equally
physically aggressive with their spouses/partner than men in their
relationships.
A reference examining assaults by women on their spouses or male
partners – an annotated bibliography by Martin S. Fiebert from the
Department of Psychology, California State University, Long Beach found
that women are perpetrators of physical and emotional abuse as or more
often, and are as or more aggressive with their partners as men.[16]
Domestic violence study directed by John Hamel, the Editor-in-Chief of
Partner Abuse, a Springer Publishing Company – a three-year research
project, conducted by 42 scholars at 20 universities and research
centers that included information on 17 areas of domestic violence
research concluded that “the victim is not always the one hit, but
sometimes the one arrested.“[17]
The study also found that men are not only disproportionately arrested
in domestic violence cases, but sometimes arrested for arbitrary
reasons, citing, for example, that police often arrest the bigger and
stronger party in cases where the perpetrator is unclear.
Even though study after study proves that women are as frequent or more
common instigators of domestic violence as men, the “arrest the male no
matter what” resolution policy automatically presumes the innocence of
the woman and guilt of the man regardless of who the aggressor is.
International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, Vol 5 Issue 1,
January – June 2010 published a study on male victims of intimate
partner violence in the United States in which it quoted a study by
George and Yarwood who found that police have threatened 47% of male
victims of intimate partner violence with arrest, ignored 35% of male
victims and 21% were actually arrested instead of the female
perpetrators.[18]
Study titled “Disabusing the Definition of Domestic Abuse: How Women
Batter Men and the Role of the Feminist State” by Linda Kelly, Professor
of Law at Indiana University School of Law, found that when abused men
call the police to report domestic violence committed against them by
their female partner, they are three times more likely to be arrested
than their spouse that is abusing them.[19]
Pro Footballer Warren Moon was arrested after he was assaulted by his
wife who threw a candlestick at this head and kneed him in the groin. To
prevent further assault, Moon restrained his wife but as soon as police
arrived, they arrested him and charged him with domestic violence. His
wife later confessed that she was being unduly violent while he did not
retaliate in any way which lead to his acquittal, but as was the case
with feminists from Davis, California who simply would not accept the
possibility that a woman falsely accused a man of rape (I mentioned the
case earlier, see reference [12]), in this case women’s group again
insisted that Moon be charged. In Anti Male world dominated by Societal
Misandry, a man is expected to be held responsible for woman’s criminal
deeds.[22]
A University of Florida study found women are more likely to “stalk, attack and abuse” their partners than men.[33]
A 2007 Center for Disease Control study found that almost a quarter
(24%) of relationships had violence, about half (49.7%) was reciprocal.
In non-reciprocally violent relationships, women were the perpetrators
in more than 70 percent of the cases.[34]
Restraining Orders
As if being subjected to domestic violence by their female partner was
not bad enough for men, to make matters even worse, in the anti male
society, women can easily file a restraining order, and just because
they are women, judges don’t even verify allegations, they just issue
the order.
How easy is it for women to get a restraining order? In 2005, Santa Fe
District Judge Daniel Sanchez issued a temporary restraining order to
“protect” Colleen Nester who alleged that what CBS talk show host David
Letterman said on his show were in fact coded messages spoken with an
intent to harass her and express his desire to marry her. When asked why
he had issues the restraining order on such a ridiculous allegation,
Judge Sanchez replied that Ms. Nestler had filled out the restraining
order request correctly.[24]
In a 2010 study on partner abuse titled “A Closer Look at Men Who
Sustain Intimate Terrorism by Women“, Professor Denise A. Hines PhD of
Clark University and Emily M. Douglas PhD of Bridgewater State College
found that of 302 men who experienced domestic violence by their wives,
38.7% reported that she filed a restraining order against him under
false pretenses.[25]
Domestic Violence Hotlines and Shelters
Anti Male Bias by Government
Anti Male Bias by Government
Research by the US based National Parents Organization found that 64% of
men who made distress calls to tax dollars funded domestic violence
shelters were told that the shelter was only helping women. Most
reported to have been laughed at and hung up on, or told that women
don’t commit domestic violence therefore it must have been the caller’s
fault.[20]
According to the research by Mankind Initiative, in the UK there are
only 13 organizations that offer refuge or safe house provision for male
victims of domestic violence with a total of 78 bed, of which 33 beds
are dedicated to male victims only (the rest being for victims of either
gender), and of these 33 dedicated beds, 18 are for gay males only. In
comparison, in the UK there are over 260 organizations with around 4,000
beds dedicated to female victims of domestic violence.[21]
In other words, in the anti-male world, at least 50% of domestic
violence victims are men, but there are at least 100x as many shelter
spaces available for women cause men need to just deal with it and stop
whining that they are being abused. Afterall, if they sought help, they
would be just laughed at and blamed for being perpetrators themselves.
Child Custody
According to the US census on Custodial Mothers and Fathers, women
receive custody of the children in about 84% of custody cases.[23]
Research on Child Maltreatment by the U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services, Administration for Children and Families found that
81.2% of children who were maltreated, were maltreated by a parent (the
remaining 18.8% were maltreated by people in nonparental relationship
with them, such as daycare stuff, foster parents, neighbors, legal
guardians, relatives, etc.). Of children maltreated by a parent, 38.3%
were maltreated by a mother, 6.0% by a mother and other person, 18.1% by
a father, 0.9 by a father and other person, and 17.9% by both a mother
and a father.[70]
We however need to take into account custodial mothers and fathers
disparity as outlined by the census listed above. According to the U.S.
Population Reference Bureau Data Brief, 71% of children are raised in a
nuclear family, 29% are raised in single-parent families. If women
receive custody in 84% of cases, we can presume that 84% of children
that grow up in single-parent families are mother-led. Thus, of 29% of
single parent families, 24.36% are mother-lead, and 4.64% are father
lead. For the benefit of women, let’s round these figures to 24%
mother-lead and 5% father-lead.
Thus, the following can be deduced:
76% of children grow up with a father present, while 95% of children grow up with a mother present.
That means that for each 100 children who grow up with a father present, 125 grow up with a mother present
Of all maltreated children, 62.2% are maltreated by a mother (sum up of
38.3% maltreated by a mother, 6.0% by a mother and other person, and
17.9% by both a mother and a father) and 36.9% are maltreated by a
father (sum up of 18.1% by a father, 0.9 by a father and other person,
and 17.9% by both a mother and a father)
That means that for each 100 children maltreated by a father, there are 168 maltreated by a mother
Thus, taking into account custodial disparity, mothers are 1.34 times more likely to maltreat their children than fathers.
It is truly alarming that women are granted custody of the children
after a split 5 times more often than men, yet they are 1.34 times more
likely to be perpetrators of maltreatment then men. In other words,
maltreatment of children would be reduced by 25.4% if instead of to the
mothers, custody of children was awarded to the fathers.
Considering that according to the Health and Human Services, 0.78
million children were maltreated between 2004 and 2008, by giving
custody of the children to the fathers instead of to the mothers,
198,120 children could have been spared maltreatment!
Scholarship Discrimination
A first-of-a-kind study of NCAA participation and scholarship data
conducted by the College Sports Council (CSC) found that female students
are accorded far more opportunities than male students to compete and
earn scholarships. Girls were awarded scholarships almost twice as often
as boys – for every 200 boys, 320 girls got scholarship.[26][27]
Hate Crimes Discrimination
Pursuant to the 1964 Civil Rights legislation, the US Department of
Justice will not investigate cases of bullying if the victim is a white
male.[28]
On some airlines, such as Air New Zealand, men are banned from sitting
next to kids on airplanes, simply because they are men and societal
anti-male bias dictates that every man is a presumed rapist. British
Airways have recently changed this discriminatory policy.[54]
Homicides
As a reality news website, there is no other place where Woman Privilege
can be observed more clearly than on Best Gore. One just needs to click
on “All The Gore” button in top menu and go from page to page to see
how utterly rare it is for a woman to become a victim of violence. And
not only is violence against women rarer than violence against men, the
severity of violence is also beyond compare.
The homicide trends study by the US Bureau of Justice Statistics found
that the victimization rate for males was 3 times higher than the rate
for females.[29]
Workplace Deaths
Again, one needs only to look around Best Gore to see that men die or
get injured performing their work duties more often than women.
Majority of employees who do dangerous jobs are men. First world
governments put significant effort to encourage women to enter fields
traditionally made up of men, but no encouragement is made to take on
the burden of doing dangerous work.
Last summer 19 firefighters died in Arizona. All of them were men. Not
surprisingly, feminist blogosphere did not explode with calls of gender
equality.[74]
Boys are brainwashed from an early age that to prove that they are
masculine, they have to take on dangerous jobs. If you need an example,
consider and army recruitment ad.
According to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, men account for 92% of all fatal work injuries.[30]
Congressional Research Service on American War and Military Operations
Casualties provided the following statistics on deaths of military
servicemen:[31]
Operation Enduring Freedom (from October 7, 2001 through February 6,
2010): Total deaths 973, of which 953 were male. Total wounded in action
4,949 of which 4,899 were male.
Operation Iraqi Freedom (from March 19, 2003 through February 6, 2010):
Total deaths 4,365 of which 4,261 were male. Total wounded in action
(since May 1, 2003) 31,103, of which 30,495 were male.
Suicides
Suicides are perhaps the best indicator of how much it sucks to be a man
and what privilege it is to be a woman. When one is pushed to go
through with suicide, to make the ultimate sacrifice (as opposed to just
making a scene in order to win the drama queen of the day award – calls
for attention with fake suicide attempts are, as preponderance of
becoming a fake rape victim, also a domain of women) and to take their
own life, the pressure on them must have been unbearable.
For every 100 females ages 15 to 19 that commit suicide, 549 males in
the same range commit suicide. For every 100 females ages 20 to 24 that
commit suicide 624 males of the same age commit suicide.[48]
One confusing factor in all this could be the finding that women attempt
suicide more often than men. This has mostly to do with the fact that
women often attempt suicide not because they mean to kill themselves,
but to draw attention to themselves. Whereas most men who attempt
suicide do it because nobody pays attention to their problems.
There are many mechanisms, including governmental institutions and non
governmental organizations dedicated exclusively to help women to cope
with stressful situations. But hardly any or none at all dedicated to
men. With few outlets for men to cope, and with pressure on them being
higher than on women, things can build up and go past the breaking point
quickly. Add to it the societal pressure on men to cope or be called a
girl, a sissy or a deadbeat and it’s easy to see why men actually go
through with suicides, as opposed to using them as a call for help.
Homelessness
6 in 7 Homeless Is a Man, But Societal Misandry Commands to Only Worry About Women
6 in 7 Homeless Is a Man, But Societal Misandry Commands to Only Worry About Women
The 2009 Annual Homeless Assessment Report by the U.S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development found that 63.7% of homeless in the USA
are men.[32]
Affirmative Action
In many countries, affirmative action in favor of women is allowed while affirmative action in favor of men is illegal.[35]
In Canada, an employer in a male dominated field is allowed to
discriminate against men and hire women preferentially, whereas an
employer in a female dominated field isn’t allowed to hire men
preferentially. While affirmative action pretends to be a noble cause,
what it does is give women a net advantage in the workplace as a whole
and discriminates against men in the workplace as a whole.
Children
Sexist Billboard Fixed - Teach Your Son How to Respect Everyone
Sexist Billboard Fixed – Teach Your Son How to Respect Everyone
In the Netherlands, women have the right to give up an unwanted child
for adoption immediately after birth, thereby stripping themselves of
all financial responsibility for the child. Men do not have this
right.[36][38]
In the US, a woman can name any man she chooses as the father. The man
gets a letter in the mail, if he does not prove he isn’t the biological
father within 30 days (problems with postal service are not an excuse)
he is now the father, cannot contest it and must pay.[49]
As per Hermesmann v. Seyer, a woman is entitled to sue the father of her
child for child support even if conception occurred as a result of a
criminal act, like statutory rape, committed by the woman.[55]
Conscription
In some countries, military service is mandatory for men. In many others, men are required to register for selective service.
In the USA, most male U.S. citizens and male immigrant non-citizens
between the ages of 18 and 25 are subjects to the Selective Service
System which makes them potential subjects to military conscription.[39]
In the Netherlands, men between the ages of 17 and 45 are subjects to the draft.[40]
Government Spending Disparity
The following figures are from British Columbia, Canada but expect
similar government spending disparity in most western societies:
In 2008/2009 the province dedicated $561,360 on grants toward men’s resources and $98,983,236 toward women’s resources.[50]
In 2009/2010 BC government spent $1,516,460 on grants toward men’s resources and $57,562,373 toward women’s resources.[51]
In 2010/2011 BC government spent $3,740,800 on grants toward men’s resources and $48,331,443 toward women’s resources.[52]
Female-owned businesses get free government money for no reason other
than because they are run by a woman (i.e. if you took two businesses of
equal niche, size, income and other factors, with the only difference
being that one is run by a woman and the other by man, it’s that one
difference that will open doors for the one run by a woman to free
government money).[53]
Health Research Disparity
Obamacare contains 148 special provisions and programs for women but
none for men, even though health and life expectancy outlooks for men
are much grimmer than for women. The US federal healthcare spending is
already 65% on women.[56]
Men die on average 7 years earlier than women. Before the age of 65 men
are three times as likely to suffer heart disease and twice as likely to
die from lung cancer than women.
An entire branch of the UN is dedicated to women issues, but nothing for men.[56]
There are branches of federal governments dedicated to women’s health issues, but none for men.[57][59]
Alleged Wage Gap
Feminazis like to use the allegation that women are paid less than men
as basis for their attacks on men. A 2009 study funded by the US
Department of Labor titled “An Analysis of the Reasons for the Disparity
in Wages Between Men and Women” found that the alleged pay gap only
exists because it’s merely a snapshot of average yearly full-time
incomes that does not account for overtime (about 90% male), type of
work performed, or other voluntary, non-discriminatory factors. In
conclusion, the Department of Labor proved that the alleged the pay gap
is caused by choices, not discrimination.[60]
Here’s also a video with Carrie Lukas, Independent Women’s Forum
Executive Director who clarified the alleged wage gap that exists
between men and women. Ms. Lukas argued that while labor surveys show
women earn 77% of what men earn for equal work, in reality women earn,
on average, as much or even more than men.[61]
Here’s another well presented report on why alleged gender pay gap is now what activists claim.[62]
Another well presented report by a woman who argues that equal pay statistics don’t like with like.[63]
Feminism Killed Chivalry
Feminism Double Standard
Feminism Double Standard
I have just read an article by a woman who wondered why a man would not
offer to help with her heavy bag on an airplane. I would consider it a
privilege to punch this bitch in the face.[65]
Welcome to equality! This is what constant battering of men achieved.
The reporter displays blatant misandry and insults men by likening them
to peacocks, but in the same breath thinks she deserves special
privileges just because she’s a woman. What a fantastic display of
feminist mentality – to be disrespectful, entitled, conceited, and
detached from reality all at once.
Could a man in his mid 50′s realistically help a younger, attractive
woman without being accused of reinforcing his sexist gender role by
assuming that the woman couldn’t take care of herself, or more
realistically, be assumed a creep and a rapist looking to get close to
his victim? I wouldn’t help any woman either. I would probably not even
look at her since mere eye contact may constitute harassment in the eyes
of the feminist who seeks to destroy every man for being a man, and
since this type of behavior is supported by the judiciary.
Chivalry is dead, and rightly so. The reason? Chivalry used be a two way
street and included a healthy respect for the men who displayed it.
But man still have it in them. They just can’t afford to risk being
cavalier for a realistic threat of having their life ruined by a rape
faker. For a man, it’s legally and socially sounder to just treat a
woman like another middle aged man.
Real Women Don't Need Feminism
Real Women Don’t Need Feminism
As for Ms. Katarina Kroslakova, author of the article – have you
considered asking for help? I doubt it cause having troubles lifting
your bag was not really your problem, as cabin crew would gladly help
you with it if they saw you couldn’t do it yourself. Your problem
clearly was your deluded sense of entitlement to privilege for being a
woman. Your demand that men help you without hitting on you suggests
that you have a long history of considering men beneath you and take
great joy in rejecting them.
Mother Nature Knows Men Have It Harder
On a societal level, facts can be misrepresented in favor of those with
bigger mouth (in this case “feminists”), so if you grew up in an anti
male society, you have likely been brainwashed to believe that women had
it harder than men. Wherever humans with their shortcomings and frailty
are involved, duplicity is to be expected. One entity that is above
human frailty and as such knows better, is Mother Nature.
Despite what feminazis and their ilk of pussy whipped men would have us
believe, Mother Nature knows that men have upon their shoulders burdens
much harder to carry than women and as such will perish at a greater
rate, so to compensate for it, she made it so more men are born then
women. Nowadays, according to the CIA factbook, current world wide sex
ratio at birth is 107 boys to 100 girls.[75]
This is Mother Nature telling us that men have it harder than women so
more of them need to be born to make up for the size of the burdens they
have to carry throughout their lives.
Feminism
To gain an understanding that we live in an anti male world is not being
anti-woman. It’s merely a call for social and legal equality between
genders. Not total equality, as that is a ridiculous concept that’s
impossible to institute. I’m talking about giving men rights that are
denied to them, including human rights such as the right to bodily
integrity or the right to access to opportunity whereby men currently
have no right to be equal in outcome.
Feminism, which is a destructive ideology that’s not only anti boy and
anti man, but also anti girl and anti woman, should face societal and
legal condemnation at minimum equal to terrorism, as its negative
effects on the innocent are far more damaging and pervasive.
Feminists argue against things like female genital mutilation in third
world countries, but are okay with male genital mutilation in first
world countries. Not to mention that feminists are completely blind to
higher suicide rates among men, higher incarceration rates, higher
victims of violence and work accidents rates, the draft, visitation
rights for fathers, court rulings against fathers, alimony, perception
of kind men as pedophiles, demonization and criminalization of male
sexuality, pulling a “victim blaming” card if someone doesn’t
automatically side with fake rape victim just because she’s a women, et
cetera.
We need to stop treating men like second class citizens who are beneath women – both culturally and legally.
Conclusion
Societal Misandry in most of what’s known as first world is heavily anti
male biased. Most countries have various commissions on the status of
women funded by taxpayer dollars, but nothing for men. Many countries
provide tax benefits for businesses that are “woman-owned” and have
contracts guaranteed to women-owned businesses, but not for men-owned
business.
Most countries have a violence against women act, and/or Department of
Justice Office on Violence Against Women, but nothing comparable for
men, yet men are twice as likely to be the victims of a violent attack.
Women are granted almost absolute rights to their own born children, yet
men only get rights to their own children when granted by the courts or
by the legal precedent of marriage to the mother.
Women live on average 7 years longer, yet countries don’t have departments of men’s health, only departments of women’s health.
Among women’s rights that men don’t have granted by legal precedent are:
The right to abortion
The right to abandon her child without her partner’s consent.
The right to place her child up for adoption without or against the father’s consent
The right to lower jail sentences for the same crime, more likely to
receive probation than incarceration and also shorter periods of
incarceration.
The right “not to be offended” in the workplace.
The right to have a man evicted from his home because she says she’s “afraid” of him.
The right to make false allegations of rape, domestic violence or child abuse with relative impunity.
The right to keep custody of children after divorce unless proven to be an unfit parent.
The right to have a man arrested on only her word, with no supporting evidence, upon an allegation of rape.
The right to women-only clubs, gyms or accommodations.
The right to use depression, PMS, or “being controlled by a man” as a legal defense and having way more of a chance of it.
The right to a standard of “self defense” that does not include an immediate threat.
Responsibilities that men have which women do not by law:
Selective service (The Draft).
A requirement to list themselves on a putative father listing to have even the thinnest rights to their children.
A requirement to support their wives (husbands can be charged with abandonment, wives cannot.)
Responsibilities that men have which women do not by legal precedent:
The responsibility to financially support their children (custodial
mothers are not slapped with an “earn this much or go to jail” order.
Plus mothers are rarely ordered to support their children who are in the
custody of the father.)
The responsibility to accept being forced into parenthood against their will.
The responsibility to get over their past as men cannot use prior abuse as a legal defense, but women can.
Furthermore:
Men do not have the right to be recognized as victims of rape when
forced into non consensual intercourse, nor do they have the right to
have those who have perpetuated these acts against them to be charged as
rapists.
Men do not have the right to be recognized as victims of domestic
violence and afforded the protections that women are. Men do not have
the right to not be arrested for reporting being victim of domestic
violence (as per mandatory arrest and primary aggressor laws).
Men receive on average a 63% percent harsher sentence for identical
convictions as a woman, an even larger gap than the racial
discrimination in court.
Men do not have the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty
beyond a reasonable doubt, especially in crimes of sexual nature, in
which they must often prove their innocence. This right has been
effectively dismantled in the recent “Dear College” letter. This mandate
is not applied generally to women.
When accused of sexual crimes on a college campus, men do not have the
right to be defended by an attorney. Men do not have the right to have
their accusation tried and investigated by law enforcement professionals
and scents vs given by judges.
US women use 20% more healthcare dollars over a lifetime but pay the same premiums.
US women use 50% more social security and survivor’s benefits but pay
significantly less tax. In some countries women even get to draw
benefits earlier.
Protect Yourself
Woman Sells Positive Pregnancy Tests on Craigslist to Help Unjust Women Take Advantage of Men in Anti male Society
Woman Sells Positive Pregnancy Tests on Craigslist to Help Unjust Women Take Advantage of Men in Anti male Society
I would like to propose to foster the equal valuing of men and women
socially as well as their equal treatment under the law. However given
the anti men toxicity of current cultural environment, I don’t see it as
a feasible possibility. Leastways not in any foreseeable future. So
I’ll propose a tip for men on how to protect themselves from societal
misandry.
Since the topic of self protection could get rather lengthy, and this
post is already a monster, I’ll narrow it down to just one tip – Don’t
Date!
Just don’t date. Ever. No ifs, buts or whats. If you need to bust your nut, either masturbate, or get a whore.
As a man in an anti male world, you will automatically put yourself at a
disadvantage if you willfully participate in a dating game. If she
won’t fuck you without you buying her something, pass on her right
there, right then and save the money you would have spent while still
facing the risk of sexual rejection, for an actual prostitute with whom
you know what you get, when and for how much.
With dating, you don’t know what you get, you don’t even know if you get
anything at all, and at the end of the day, it will always cost you
more. It will cost you not only in money, but also in time you will
never get back, and you will have to play a tool to her with courtship
and other anti male societal norms.
The world is already in their favor, not yours. Don’t make it worse for yourself by playing their game.
No comments:
Post a Comment